WhatsApp evidence, certified
Turn a WhatsApp conversation into an exhibit prepared for filing under Section 63 BSA.
A numbered, timestamped transcript, a pre-filled certificate under Section 63(4) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, and the SHA-256 hash the Schedule requires you to disclose. You see the whole document before you pay, and it stays in your account for a year so you can download it again.
0849d13c8a8872843938ec4d2b8bbe3a
2,567 entries · 147 pages · hash disclosed on the record
In WhatsApp: open the chat → ⋮ → More → Export chat. You sign in with a six-digit code we email you — no password. Your file is sent over an encrypted connection to our servers in India, read once to build your exhibit, and kept in your account for a year. You can delete it at any time.
How it works
Four steps, and you read the document before you pay.
.txt or .zip WhatsApp gave you. We read it, fix its SHA-256 hash and run eleven integrity checks.Before you file
How this evidence is actually used.
Written to be useful whether or not you use the tool: what the certificate asks for, how to take an export that will stand up, and how chat evidence is treated in Indian proceedings.
Start here
By proceeding
What you receive
Eight parts, in the order the Schedule sets them out.
Section63 prepares the form of a certificate and records the hash of the file it receives. It does not verify the truth of a conversation, the identity of the participants, or the declaration you sign — and it is not legal advice.
Why the hash matters
In Pune Bar Association v. Union of India (2026) the Supreme Court upheld the Section 63(4) certificate and held that the hash value of electronic data “is synonymous with an electronic fingerprint.” Part A of the Schedule requires it to be disclosed. Every exhibit issued here states it.
A hash fixes the file as it was received. On its own it does not show the file came out of WhatsApp rather than a text editor — which is the objection every product in this category invites. So Annexure C sets out eleven checks against structure the application itself writes and an edited transcript loses, and reports what each one found. They corroborate; they do not decide. Admissibility is for the court.
Questions
Your account, your file, and how long it is kept.
More in the privacy policy and the terms.