Section63 Guides s.63 BSA 2023

Home · Guides · updated 2 September 2026

Filing a chat exhibit

The certificate and the exhibit are one half of it. The other half is the mechanics — what is listed, what is served, what physically reaches the court, and when.

What actually goes on the file

For a chat exhibit there are four things, and they travel together:

The listing of documents should describe them as what they are. “WhatsApp chat between the plaintiff and the defendant dated ___ to ___, exported on ___, SHA-256 ___” identifies a record. “Copy of WhatsApp chat” identifies nothing, and invites the question of which copy.

When the certificate is filed

File it with the record. In Arjun Panditrao Khotkar (2020) the Supreme Court held the certificate mandatory for secondary electronic evidence and spent much of the judgment on the position of a party who had not filed one in time. Nothing is gained by putting yourself in that position when the certificate can simply accompany the document.

If the certificate is being filed later — because the deponent was unavailable, or because the record was produced by another party — that is an application, on facts, and it is an argument you have to win before the evidence is of any use to you.

Getting the file to the court

Serving the other side

Serve the same thing you filed: the exhibit, the certificate, and the file. A party who receives only a printout cannot recompute the hash, which means they cannot verify the record — and a record that could not be verified is one they will invite the court to disregard, with some justice.

It is also the stronger position tactically. An opponent handed the file, the hash and the commands to check it has been given nothing to complain about, and has to argue about what the conversation means rather than about how it was produced.

Marking and citing

Keep the source available

The device the export came from should remain available and unaltered for as long as the record is in issue. A court that genuinely doubts a chat may want the handset examined, and a phone that was traded in six months ago cannot be produced. This is also why the export should be taken early rather than at the door of the court.

The redaction trap

Redacting the transcript changes the file, which changes the hash, which breaks the certificate. If something must be redacted, certify the record as it is and produce the redacted version as a separate, disclosed document. Group chats deals with this at length, because it is where the question usually arises.

Before it leaves the office

  1. Recompute the hash of the file you are about to file, and check it against the certificate.
  2. Check Part A is signed by the right person and Part B is completed — not left blank “for later”.
  3. Check the exhibit’s own page count and numbering match the copy being served.
  4. Read the exhibit once as if you were the other side. The challenge checklist is written for exactly that pass.

This guide explains procedure and states the law as we understand it. It is not legal advice, and Aarohan Enterprises is not a law firm. Whether a court admits a particular record, and what weight it gives it, is for that court to decide. Have an advocate settle anything you intend to file.

Prepare one now

Section63 builds this document from your export.

Drop in the .txt or .zip WhatsApp gives you and read the whole exhibit — transcript, Part A, Part B, Schedules and the integrity checks — before you pay.

More guides

The Section 63 certificate

The certificate formatThe form the Schedule to Section 63(4) BSA calls for, set out in full: Part A for the person producing the record, Part B for the expert, and the particulars of the record and the device.
Who signs Part AChoosing the right deponent for the Section 63(4) certificate: lawful control of the device, why an advocate or clerk should not sign, and what to do when the phone belonged to someone else.
Who can sign Part BThe expert certificate under Section 63(4) BSA, the Section 79A question, and what the Supreme Court decided — and expressly did not decide — in 2026.
From Section 65B to Section 63What the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 changed for electronic evidence certificates, and what carried over from Section 65B of the Evidence Act.

Preparing and filing the record

Exporting a chat for courtStep by step: exporting a WhatsApp conversation on Android and iPhone, with or without media, what the .txt and .zip contain, and how to get the file off the phone without changing it.
Screenshots vs an exportWhat a WhatsApp screenshot can and cannot establish in court, how it differs from an export, and how to produce a screenshot properly when it is genuinely all you have.
WhatsApp chat to PDF for courtHow to convert a WhatsApp chat to a PDF for court in India: what the rendered transcript has to contain, why the PDF is not the certified record, and what has to be filed alongside it.
The WhatsApp export .zipWhat WhatsApp puts inside the .zip it gives you, why unzipping and re-zipping breaks the hash, and how the transcript and the attachment files become a single Section 63 exhibit.
Preserving the conversationWhat to do the moment a WhatsApp conversation becomes evidence: stop the losses, take the export, keep the handset, and understand what preservation does and does not establish.
Verifying the hash, step by stepThe exact commands to recompute a SHA-256 hash on Windows, macOS and Linux, what a match proves, and what to do when it does not match.
“Media omitted”: what it meansWhy a WhatsApp export says media omitted, whether the files can be recovered, and how to take an export that includes them.
Photographs, voice notes and documentsHow attachments from a WhatsApp conversation are produced in Indian proceedings, why each file needs its own hash, and how media is tied back to the transcript.
Voice notes, audio and transcriptsHow WhatsApp voice notes and audio are produced in Indian proceedings: the .opus file, who prepares the transcript, translation into the language of the court, and what identifies the speaker.

What a chat can and cannot prove

Are chats valid evidence?Whether WhatsApp messages are admissible in Indian courts under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, what the Section 63(4) certificate requires, and the difference between admissibility, proof and weight.
Deleted messagesWhat happens to deleted WhatsApp messages, why an export cannot recover them, what a backup does and does not restore, and the routes that actually exist when the deleted content matters.
Challenging chat evidence: a checklistThe grounds on which chat evidence is attacked in Indian proceedings: certificate defects, provenance, completeness, attribution and alteration.
Group chats, attribution and third partiesThe particular problems of group conversations in evidence: who said what, participants who are strangers to the dispute, and what to redact.
The limits of a WhatsApp exportThe honest limits of chat evidence: deleted and disappearing messages, edited messages, forwarding, read receipts and what an export is not.
WhatsApp Business and company accountsProducing WhatsApp Business conversations in Indian proceedings: who was in lawful control of a company account, what the Business app adds to the record, and how orders and automated replies are read.
Timestamps, order and time zonesHow WhatsApp writes dates and times into an export, whose clock and time zone they come from, why 05/06 is ambiguous, and what a gap in the sequence does and does not show.

By proceeding

Divorce and matrimonialHow chat evidence is used in matrimonial proceedings in India, which conversation to produce, the problem with messages taken off a spouse’s phone, and what a transcript can and cannot establish.
498A cruelty proceedingsHow chat evidence is used in Section 498A IPC (now Section 85 BNS) proceedings by both sides, what a transcript can establish about demands and conduct, and how records are used at the quashing stage.
Maintenance proceedingsHow chat evidence is used to establish income, concealed earnings and standard of living in maintenance proceedings, alongside the affidavit of disclosure required by Rajnesh v. Neha.
Domestic violence (PWDVA)How chat evidence is used in proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — verbal, emotional and economic abuse, interim relief, and producing the record properly.
Cheque bounce (s.138 NI Act)How chat evidence is used in Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act proceedings: proving the underlying debt, rebutting the presumption, acknowledgment of liability and part payment.
Contract and commercial disputesHow chat evidence is used in commercial matters: formation and variation of contracts by message, purchase orders and delivery, admissions of dues, arbitration agreements, and business account records.

हिन्दी

WhatsApp चैट कोर्ट में कैसे पेश करेंWhatsApp चैट को भारतीय अदालत में सबूत के तौर पर पेश करने की पूरी प्रक्रिया: चैट एक्सपोर्ट, SHA-256 हैश, धारा 63(4) BSA का प्रमाणपत्र (भाग A और भाग B), और दाखिल करते समय क्या-क्या देना होता है।