Is Section 65B still valid?

The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 with effect from 1 July 2024. Section 63 BSA now occupies the ground Section 65B held. Case law decided under Section 65B, such as Arjun Panditrao Khotkar, continues to be cited on the principles that carried over.

What is the main difference between Section 65B and Section 63?

The most visible differences are that the certificate is now in the form of a prescribed Schedule with two parts, that the hash value of the record must be stated, and that Part B calls for an expert’s signature in addition to the deponent’s.

Guide · updated 1 September 2026

From Section 65B to Section 63: what actually changed

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 replaced the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 on 1 July 2024. For electronic records the structure survived, but the certificate did not survive unchanged.

What carried over

The architecture is the same. An electronic record may be given in secondary form without producing the device, provided conditions about regular use, lawful control, ordinary course and proper operation are satisfied, and provided a certificate is filed. The rule in Arjun Panditrao Khotkar (2020) — that the certificate is mandatory, not a formality to be excused — carried over with it.

What changed

A prescribed form. Section 65B required a certificate but did not prescribe its shape, and practice varied widely. Section 63(4) requires the certificate to be in the form of the Schedule, in two parts.
The hash value. The Schedule requires the hash of the electronic record to be stated, with the algorithm used. Section 65B had no such requirement. This is the biggest practical change: the file must be fixed and identified, not merely described.
An expert’s signature. Part B calls for a certificate by an expert in addition to the deponent’s at Part A. Section 65B contemplated one signatory. See who can sign Part B.
Wider definition. The BSA expressly contemplates information stored in semiconductor memory and on communication devices, which removes arguments turning on whether a phone was a “computer”.

What this means for a chat

Under Section 65B it was common to file a printout with a short certificate. That is no longer sufficient on its face: the Schedule wants the hash of the record, and a printout has no hash worth stating. The practical consequence is that the underlying export becomes the thing certified, and the transcript is the readable form of it.

It also means order of operations matters. The hash must be taken from the file as produced, before it is re-saved, converted or repackaged, because any of those changes it.

Transitional points

Proceedings are dealt with under the law in force at the relevant time, and courts have continued to apply Section 65B reasoning where it fits. If you are filing now, file under Section 63 in the form of the Schedule; if you are reading a judgment from before July 2024, expect Section 65B language for the same underlying idea.

This guide explains procedure and states the law as we understand it. It is not legal advice, and Aarohan Enterprises is not a law firm. Whether a court admits a particular record, and what weight it gives it, is for that court to decide. Have an advocate settle anything you intend to file.

Prepare one now

Section63 builds this document from your export.

Drop in the .txt or .zip WhatsApp gives you and read the whole exhibit — transcript, Part A, Part B, Schedules and the integrity checks — before you pay.

Start with your export

More guides

Verifying the hash, step by stepThe exact commands to recompute a SHA-256 hash on Windows, macOS and Linux, what a match proves, and what to do when it does not match.

Challenging chat evidence: a checklistThe grounds on which chat evidence is attacked in Indian proceedings: certificate defects, provenance, completeness, attribution and alteration.

“Media omitted”: what it meansWhy a WhatsApp export says media omitted, whether the files can be recovered, and how to take an export that includes them.

Photographs, voice notes and documentsHow attachments from a WhatsApp conversation are produced in Indian proceedings, why each file needs its own hash, and how media is tied back to the transcript.

Who can sign Part BThe expert certificate under Section 63(4) BSA, the Section 79A question, and what the Supreme Court decided — and expressly did not decide — in 2026.

Group chats, attribution and third partiesThe particular problems of group conversations in evidence: who said what, participants who are strangers to the dispute, and what to redact.

The limits of a WhatsApp exportThe honest limits of chat evidence: deleted and disappearing messages, edited messages, forwarding, read receipts and what an export is not.